In each example, the section that refers to a source has been highlighted in bold. Discussions should be conducted with colleagues in the same area of interest, and time should be reserved for the solution of the problem s. Though a consensus has been reached about the systematic design of the review articles, studies revealed that most of them had not been written in a systematic format.
This may not always be the case. Clinicians frequently benefit from review articles to update their knowledge in their field of specialization, and use these articles as a starting point for formulating guidelines.
The main and fundamental purpose of writing a review is to create a readable synthesis of the best resources available in the literature for an important research question or a current area of research.
The thread of the author's argument becomes lost in an overuse of empirical data Results Study selection 17 Give numbers of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally with a flow diagram.
Systematic reviews can be diivded into qualitative, and quantitative reviews. The first is This explanation has a few weaknesses that other researchers have pointed out see Author, Year; Author, Year.