12 angry men movie review essay
One of the key characters is Juror No. In the film 12 Angry Men, many of the pros and cons of group communication are highlighted.
With a new understanding of himself he is able to change his vote to not guilty. Over the years it has found a constituency, however, and in a Internet Movie Database poll it was listed 23rd among the best films of all time.
Hook for 12 angry men
I have watched this movie before this assignment but watching it for the assignment made me look at the different principles involved. In planning the movie, he says, a "lens plot" occurred to him: To make the room seem smaller as the story continued, he gradually changed to lenses of longer focal lengths, so that the backgrounds seemed to close in on the characters. The rest of the jury resents the inconvenient of his decision. That the old lady saw the boy kill his father through her window, whilst a train was passing. Henry Fonda Juror 8 points out the double standard to the others when he says "she"s on of them too? In purpose, it's a crash course in those passages of the Constitution that promise defendants a fair trial and the presumption of innocence. Each of them come from different situations with individual and unique experiences.
Teams and groups are often terms that are used interchangeable to describe a multitude of gathered individuals. As a group that was formed solely…. One man in particular, Juror 3 Lee J. To improve our thinking, we actually have to think for ourselves, to explore and make sense of thinking situations by using our thinking abilities.
Argument Analysis. The extraordinary element is that their finding will determine his life or death.
12 angry men jurors
We see the murder weapon, a switch-blade knife, and hear the jurors debate the angle of the knife wound. There were possibilities of false testimony. In the United States, a verdict in most criminal trials by jury must be unanimous. We will see how the contents of the unconscious area will largely effect the decision making process of some of the jurors. The vote has to be unanimous either guilty or not guilty for the case to end. A guilty verdict would mean that the accused would receive the death penalty. In doing so, he realizes the power of his emotions which forces him to step back and take a look at what he really feels. Teams and groups are often terms that are used interchangeable to describe a multitude of gathered individuals. In this film, the numerous functional and dysfunctional properties of the jury men play a big role in analysing and evaluating the main purpose at hand, namely identifying the young man guilty or innocent for the murder of his father. The twelve jurors have to put their personal conflicts aside to reach the verdict. We watch as Fonda imitates the shuffling step of the old man, a stroke victim, to see if he could have gotten to the door in time to see the murderer fleeing. Secondly, it allows him to vent his frustrations. The broken relationship with his son preoccupies his thoughts as several times throughout the movie he is found staring at the picture. Unfortunately, leaving our prejudices outside the court room door is near impossible.
He levels with the others by openly admitting that he does not know if the boy killed his father and solicits feedback in order to make an accurate decision.
based on 25 review